Search
Navigation
Blogroll
Archive
|
 Tuesday, May 15, 2007
Milwaukee Router Kit Delayed
 In any business timing is everything. We see this firsthand in our June 2007 issue of Popular Woodworking magazine. The article that reinforces this well-known business adage is the “Two-Base Router Kits.”
We’ve selected the Milwaukee 5616-24 kit as the Editor’s Choice. As might be expected, many woodworkers have taken our advice and decided to purchase the kit. However, the Milwaukee 5616-24 is nowhere to be found. It’s not at your local woodworking store, at Amazon.com nor available at the so-called “Big Box” stores. Reason being – Milwaukee has yet to release this kit.
The kit we tested is indeed the router kit that will be available; it just hasn’t been given the final approval from the folks at Milwaukee. So, here’s the skinny. If pushed for a release date, and we did push, the company suggested a date of late June. I might give them and extra week or two to feel confident. It is coming and it’s exactly how and what we said it was.
Bottom line. If I needed a router immediately I would buy the Milwaukee 5616-20, which is the fixed base, 2-1/4 horsepower model with the body grip design. Then, I’d pick up the plunge base when it’s available. (We’re assured it will be sold separately when released.)
That’ll cost you about $20 more in the long run because the plunge base will be offered at $99. Add that to the $170 price of the 5616-20’s and your assembled kit ends up with a final cost of $269. The 5616-24 has a suggested price of $249.
If I needed a plunge base right away or didn’t want to part with the extra $20, I’d go for one of the other two-base router kits that scored well in our review. There are a number to select from.
– Glen D. Huey
Read other entries by Glen D. Huey
Tuesday, May 15, 2007 9:08:02 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, May 14, 2007
Testing Wood Joints to Failure
Why joints fail and why woodworkers fail as scientists
Whenever my late Uncle Archie came to visit, he would drive my mother crazy with where he chose to sit. He was a big man, weighing over 350 pounds and he invariably would choose a small, delicate Queen Anne reproduction from the 1890s with a needlepoint seat. Maybe he enjoyed making my mom gasp with fear or maybe he just liked sitting in a chair that he sat in as a kid. In any case, that little chair never complained, never creaked and never failed. It was made by a man who knew his trade. Luckily for the chair, my mom's peace of mind and my uncle's pride, the chair maker didn't rely on information he read in a magazine somewhere.
One of the most frequent questions we are asked is what's the best/strongest/correct joint to use in woodworking? The answer usually starts with several other questions. What's the application? What wood? What are your skills? What tools do you have available? With those variables in mind, you can make an intelligent choice, but there will be several options that are all "more than strong enough." It's a multiple choice question with multiple correct answers.
Most woodworking joints have evolved over thousands of years. Woodworkers learned to make them based on their own experience, and the experience of the people who taught them. To make successful joints you need a little experience, a basic knowledge of the workings of wood and glue, and a bit of common sense. But in the 21st century we want a definitive answer. We want numbers and we want proof. We want something in writing we can point to when we're not sure of ourselves.
Like other magazines, we have tested joints to destruction. 
The last time we did it was in December 2005, and our weapon of choice was the anvil. It was a silly notion, and the point of the tomfoolery was that pseudo-scientific testing in a magazine is a rather pointless endeavor. There are so many variables in material, techniques and proportions of joints that gathering meaningful data would require thousands of samples and take months if not years to complete. If you only break a few joints, you might well be measuring the quality of the raw material, the skill of the guy who put things together, or several other variables that have nothing to do with what you want to learn.

Which doesn't mean the anvil test was meaningless. It did show us some surprising things, notably how good today's glues are, and how important it is to consider proportions of joints in the context of the pieces being joined. We knew going into the test that a well-made draw-bored mortise-and-tenon joint is incredibly strong, and that dowel joints almost always fail eventually. We now know a bit more about how and why and we had some fun doing it. But it bothers us when we see a test that takes itself too seriously, or when joints are labeled as "not so good" when the flaw is in the size and placement of the components, or of the wood rather than the joint.

If woodworking were more science than art, it wouldn’t be as much fun. If you want to read the “Anvil Test” click here. Keep in mind that it was written by a woodworker, not an engineer in destructive testing. It contains a lot of good information about different joints, but it doesn’t reveal which is the best/strongest/correct joint. I hope it makes you smile and make you think about how you approach the craft. That’s the whole idea.
— Bob Lang
Read other entries by Robert W. Lang | Read other Tool Tests
Monday, May 14, 2007 4:06:22 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
Tool Test – Ashely Iles Carving Tools
From August 2006 Popular Woodworking
Good Steel and Good Handles
Last summer and fall I extensively tested several carving gouges from English toolmaker Ashley Iles. Midway through the testing, I was impressed enough to go out and buy several additional gouges. Both the long-handled “London” pattern and short-handled palm tools were comfortable in the hand and nicely finished with beech handles and excellent quality steel. 
They compared favorably to the Pfiel gouges I already own, have a nicer finish on both the handle and blade, and are competitively priced. I was particularly impressed with the condition of the blades. Many new carving tools look nice, but the shininess is due to overbuffing. The Ashley Iles blades were accurately and finely ground so only minimal honing was needed before using them. In use, they held their edges very well. Hundreds of sizes and sweep patterns are available, as are several different sets. You also receive a discount by ordering six or more chisels.
— Robert W. Lang
More information on Ashley Iles tools from Tools for Working Wood
Share your experience with this tool by leaving a comment
Read other entries by Robert W. Lang | Read other Tool Tests
Monday, May 14, 2007 9:50:43 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
Tool Test - Powermatic PM2000 Table Saw
From August 2006 Popular Woodworking
Features and Performance for Serious Woodworkers
My first look at the newest cabinet saw from Powermatic was last year when the company was still working out some final details. At the time, the most difficult concept to grasp was how the PM2000 would fit into the product line alongside the Powermatic Model 66 cabinet saw that has become an industry standard. In short, the Model 66 is designed for more physically demanding millwork situations, such as ripping hardwood lumber all day long. The PM2000 incorporates features that will appeal to a furniture maker who switches between setups throughout the day.

Let’s look at a few of those new features on the PM2000. First off, it has an integrated mobile base. See it in the picture? You won’t! It’s built into the cabinet of the saw. To use the mobile base you pull the blade-tilting wheel (on the right of the cabinet) away from the saw to engage a second geared mechanism. That handle then becomes the adjusting handle for the mobile base. It lifts the saw only a fraction of an inch off the floor, but it’s enough to get things moving (please pardon the pun). After use in our shop for a month or so, we’ve noticed that the thread pitch on the mobile-base lift requires more turns than we’d prefer and there seem to be some concerns with dust getting into the threads, affecting the ease of movement. Powermatic representatives agree and both of these items are under consideration for an upgrade.
Another question we had was about the “mobility” of the saw when a 50"-fence rail and extension table without casters is added. We were told (and we checked) that once the saw is raised onto its casters, the extension table can be lifted easily enough (again, a fraction of an inch is enough) and the saw can essentially be steered from the extension table without causing any harm to the saw.
Powermatic improved the blade-changing process as well, by adding an arbor lock that allows one-wrench blade changes, doing away with the stick that we all end up jamming against the blade to make the change. The lock is easy to use and a nice feature.

The arbor lock works by sliding the spring-loaded red lever toward the
blade support until the tooth engages one of the notches. A single
wrench is then used to loosen (or tighten) the arbor nut.
The third major change (and our favorite) is the addition of a true riving knife. For those unfamiliar, a riving knife is a steel plate mounted behind the blade that raises and lowers with the blade (see photo below). Essentially it’s the splitter part of the guard, but it stays in place without the guard, providing an extra level of safety when using the saw. In our opinion this is a table saw addition that’s way overdue. At press time the riving knife will only be available as an accessory, but we hope that will soon change. Powermatic has also added a dust shroud around the blade to improve dust collection and included a good quality miter gauge.

The black riving knife serves as a splitter to keep the saw kerf in the
wood from closing after the cut, which could pinch the blade. The top
of the riving knife is always just below the blade height, so it can
remain in place when making grooves and dados.
We tested the 3 horsepower, single phase, 220-volt model with the 30"-fence rail system. You may prefer the 50" rail set in your shop, but we felt the balance between mobility and capacity was best in this model. Conveniently, we had a 5hp Model 66 sitting in the shop at the same time, so we were able to compare the motor performance between the two saws.
I ripped a few pieces of 3"-thick white oak on both saws and found very little difference. Neither sliced like a hot knife through butter, but they also showed little difficulty in handling the task – a strong positive statement for the smaller motor on the PM2000. A 3 hp Model 66 is $150 more than the PM2000. Other accessories that will be available for the PM2000 include zero-clearance and dado-insert plates. Because of the riving knife design, the PM2000 uses a different size throat insert than the Model 66. To sum up, we like the PM2000 performance and the features it offers to both the home and professional woodworker. As a “next generation,” it stands proud alongside the Model 66.
— David Thiel
More information on the Model 2000 Table saw from Powermatic
Share your experience with this tool by leaving a comment.
Read other Tool Tests
Monday, May 14, 2007 9:35:07 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
Tool Test - Lie-Nielsen Medium Shoulder Plane
From August 2006 Popular Woodworking
Exquisite!
I’ve long been a fan of large shoulder planes and have many miles on my Lie-Nielsen 073, which I bought the first day it was available. So I wasn’t sure I needed the company’s new 3⁄4" shoulder plane when I ordered it. Surprisingly, the medium shoulder plane gets as much use as the bigger tool. The 3⁄4" width gets this tool into the bottoms of dados to clean out the unevenness or junk left by coarser tools. At 2.3 pounds, it weighs almost two pounds less than its bigger brother, which makes it a bit easier to wield when working narrow stock and small rabbets.
 And, of course, it excels at its primary job – trimming tenon shoulders and cheeks. Like all Lie-Nielsen tools, the medium shoulder plane is made to high standards. I placed a straightedge on the sole and it revealed that it was perfect. Then I placed a machinist’s square on the sidewalls to check their orientation to the sole. If the sidewalls aren’t perfect to the sole the tool will never work quite right. Both sidewalls were dead-on perfect all along the tool’s body. The real surprise was the iron. With most tools, I’ve come to expect some serious work to flatten and polish the unbeveled face of the iron. Lately, I’ve found Lie-Nielsen (and its competitor, Veritas) to have irons that require almost no work. This one took a scant five minutes to sharpen and go. That’s worth something in my book.
Which brings me to the price: $175. You might be able to buy a vintage Preston, Record or Stanley shoulder plane for a bit less, but I ask you: How will you true up the sole or sidewalls if they’re not perfect? With the modern tools, you can send back the ones that aren’t perfect. And for those of us who prefer woodworking to metalworking (a show of hands, please) the price is incidental. Especially when you take into account this is the last one you’ll ever have to buy.
— Christopher Schwarz
More information on the Medium Shoulder Plane from Lie-Nielsen
Share your experience with this tool by leaving a comment.
Read other entries by Christopher Schwarz | Read other Tool Tests
Monday, May 14, 2007 9:14:21 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
Tool Test - Triton MOF001KC Router
From August 2006 Popular Woodworking
In a world of mid-sized routers offering both a fixed and plunge base, the Triton MOF001KC is a competitively priced, dedicated plunge with lots of features. It’s a scaled down version of the 31⁄4 hp TRC001 plunge router, and offers all of the same features.
The MOF001KC has three plunge modes: free plunge, handle winder and micro adjust. The free plunge is just as it sounds and is selected by fully depressing the orange “plunge mode” button in the center of the right handle. The lever lock now controls the position of the plunge. To use the router with a more controlled plunge action, release the plunge mode button and pull the winder clutch ring (positioned on the inside of the right handle) toward the handle and then rotate the handle to move the motor up or down. Micro adjust is possible when in the winder mode by turning the micro-winder knob at the top of the router. The plunge options take a little getting used to, but once familiar, I found them handy.
The MOF001KC is also designed for use in a router table. When in place, the micro adjust is accessed through the back with the included winder handle. When changing bits (in or out of a table) the collet is easily reached by fully extending the collet through the base. When fully extended, a collet lock engages so only a single wrench is required. Another feature for table use is the ability to easily remove the return spring, making in-table height adjustments easier.
The Triton router is outfitted with efficient at-the-base dust collection and a below-the-base dust shroud. The variable-speed motor is equipped with soft start and a power switch door that remains in the open position when the router is on. Both are good safety features. The router also comes with 1⁄4" and 1⁄2" collets, a seven-piece template guide kit, fence and circle cutter.
I found the MOF001KC router a bit loud (91 decibels), but it performed well. It’s slightly larger than some of the competition, but overall felt good during use. The many features are an advantage, but may seem overwhelming until you become familiar with them.
— David Thiel
More information on this router from Triton
Share your experience with this tool by leaving a comment.
Read other Tool Tests
Monday, May 14, 2007 9:02:14 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
Tool Test - Veritas Bevel Setter
From August 2006 Popular Woodworking
At first blush I looked at this tool and said, “Twenty-five bucks for this?” Then I took a closer look and realized how many things it will do. I now believe it’s $25 well spent. Actually it’s only $24.50, but let’s not quibble. To understand this tool, think of the bevel setter as more of a Swiss Army Knife for angles. You can set a sliding bevel accurately to 1⁄2° anywhere between 0° and 60°. Or you can use your sliding T-bevel to gauge an angle and then use the setter to find out what that angle truly is.
 Flip the sturdy 3" x 7" stainless steel blade over and you’ve got setups for seven of the most common dovetail angles, as well as settings for 12 polygon miter angles. And just for good measure, they’ve added a scale on each long edge marked in inches (by 1⁄16") and millimeters respectively.
The indicator marks on the bevel setter are etched and the finish is excellent. The machined aluminum fence moves smoothly and locks effortlessly with a knurled brass knob. Non-mar pads on the back of the fence keep the blade looking nice. The folks at Lee Valley/Veritas continue to stretch their imaginations and offer tools that a woodworker will not only want to own, but will use constantly. The bevel setter is another in that line of tools.
— David Thiel
More information on the Bevel Setter from Veritas
Share your experience with this tool by leaving a comment
Read other Tool Tests
Monday, May 14, 2007 8:23:56 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
Tool Test - Dado Wiz
From August 2006 Popular Woodworking
Dado Wiz Zeros in on Perfect Fit for Dados or Grooves
Our staff has an ongoing discussion about the best way to make dados. Whether using a dado stack or router, the trick is getting the dado or groove the proper thickness to match the material. I prefer using a router; that’s why I was pleased to learn about the The Dado Wiz (the black plate shown at right) locks to most clamps and guides (5⁄8" thickness maximum). Temporary pins are put in place on the Wiz and a sample piece is used to adjust the guide to perfectly fit the shelf or divider material.
The included brass template guide and your 1⁄4", 3⁄8" or 1⁄2" router bit is then used to make two passes (one up, one back) to make a perfectly sized groove or dado with a single setup. The Dado Wiz slides on your guide during the cut, controlling the position of the bit. The Dado Wiz efficiently answers a need when routing dados. It does come at a price that’s a little steep, but if you prefer routed dados, this jig belongs in your shop.
— David Thiel
More information on the Dado Wiz from Woodline
Share your experience with this tool by leaving a comment.
Read other Tool Tests
Monday, May 14, 2007 8:16:15 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Thursday, May 10, 2007
Tool Test - Bosch PS20-2 Pocket Driver
From October 2006 Popular WoodworkingBosch Pocket Driver Offers Pint-sized Power
I don’t care how many cordless drills you own, if you like tools, you’re going to need one more. The Pocket Driver elicits the same response from everyone who sees it: “It’s cute!” And that it is, but the really nice part is that it performs as well.  Powered by a 10.8-volt lithium ion battery (two included), this drill performs like a good 12-volt model, and it weighs only 4.4 pounds, fitting comfortably in the palm of your hand. Bosch boasts the drill will drive 100 3" screws. Honestly, I stopped at 75 1-5⁄8" deck screws (comfortably sunk below surface depth in treated pine) because that’s more than enough proven power out of a drill that I wouldn’t even use for that task. This drill is designed to be handy, whether dropped in a work belt, shop apron or any number of drawers around the house. Its size lets you work in tight or awkward spaces (think about installing drawer slides) while still providing lots of power. I did find one thing to pick on. The LED light is a nice addition, but because of its location the clutch ring keeps the light from shining on the actual impact point for all applications. Who cares? Buy one! — David ThielMore information on the PS20 Pocket Driver from BoschShare your experience with this tool by leaving a comment Read other Tool Tests
Thursday, May 10, 2007 2:35:01 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
Tool Test - Chester Toolworks Birdcage Awl
From October 2006 Popular WoodworkingA Bigger Birdcage Awl
Birdcage awls are outstanding and accurate tools for installing hardware. In essence, they are a boring tool: Place the tip where you want your screw and twist the tool back and forth. When you’re done, you have a perfect tapered hole for your screw. Birdcage awls are outstanding and accurate tools for installing hardware. In essence, they are a boring tool: Place the tip where you want your screw and twist the tool back and forth. When you’re done, you have a perfect tapered hole for your screw. 
Even with a cordless drill/driver on my workbench I’ll choose the awl when pinpoint accuracy matters, as it almost always does when installing hardware. The tool has become an endangered species of late, and so I was delighted to learn that Chester Toolworks has begun making an elegant and hard-working version. The square-shaped shaft on this birdcage awl is thicker (3⁄16" square) than most examples I’ve encountered, but the hole it makes is perfect for most cabinet hardware. The handle is shaped to nestle in your palm and the small bead by the tool’s ferrule also helps you apply the right downward pressure.
These tools are handmade by Dave Anderson and can be handled in a variety of woods, including snakewood and ebony (shown). Anderson also makes a line of scratch awls, marking knives and bowsaws, all of which are finished to the same high degree.
— Christopher SchwarzMore information on the Birdcage Awl from Chester ToolworksShare your experience with this tool by leaving a comment
Read other entries by Christopher Schwarz | Read other Tool Tests
Thursday, May 10, 2007 2:23:50 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
|