Subscribe | Renew | Give a Gift

Popular Woodworking Editors' Blog

Sign In  
# Wednesday, January 16, 2008
Don't Use Push Sticks or Pads


I hope you’ve had an opportunity to read the “Woodworking Essentials” column in the February 2008 issue of Popular Woodworking (#167). In it, Marc Adams discusses power jointers and a better way to work. I have to admit that I had a few issues with Marc’s article, but I’m not the safest guy in the shop. However, I did learn a number of ways to improve my time at the jointer.

One area in which I veer from Marc’s teachings is in the use of push sticks and push pads. Let me say that if you use these implements, he shows you exactly how they should be gripped and used. My statement is: I don’t use sticks and pads. I use gloves. There it is – deal with it.

OK, now that you’ve calmed down and the little hairs on the back of your neck have laid flat, let me explain what, why and how I use gloves. I only use them at the jointer and I remove them before moving to any other tools.

The gloves I use are gripping-style gloves that are used to grip lumber or other materials. I’ve used PVC dot-covered gloves, gloves that are palm coated with rubber and those with a honeycomb pattern.

To answer the "why," I feel I have more control when using gloves. Naturally, your hands read or feel the lumber as it moves over the jointer bed. You can feel where the board hits and skips the knives or if you need to speed or slow the travel to obtain a cleaner cut. When you add a push stick or pad to the process, you remove the ability to feel the board as well as access that information. Also, the gripping action of my gloves ensures that I’ll not slip while working. That’s not something I feel you can say when using the push pads (those always seem awkward to use). And imagine the ease of moving the board back for a second pass – no putting down the push stick or pad to then grab the board to move.

Next, let’s look at how I use gloves. Of course, you should never allow your hand to perch beyond the trailing edge of the board. So, don’t use your palm to push the lumber. The reason we’re tempted to hook our palm over the trailing edge of the board is to gain a hold and not allow the lumber to slip. But, if you’re using grip-type gloves, you can simply place your hands anywhere along the board – the gripping action holds firm and allows you to move the lumber with ease.

Even I have a limit to the glove scenario. I will not use gloves for jointing pieces that are less than 3" wide. Below that width I cannot position my hands or fingers properly to gain the added control. From 3" to 5" I use my glove-covered fingertips and the side of my hands for my hold. Above 5" in width I position my palms flat to the stock at go about my work.

Now before you send me a message or comment on how wrong I am because you’ve read “no gloves in the shop” all your woodworking life, buy a pair of gloves and give it a try. I’ll bet you’ll immediately notice the added control and the information gained from your work. But, if you try it and still think I’m wrong – fire away.

And if you happen to agree with my glove use, add your comment. We might start a new movement that will rock the foundation of safety in the woodshop.

–Glen D. Huey


Read other entries by Glen D. Huey
Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, January 16, 2008 11:34:23 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [43] 
# Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Tool Test: Combination Machines

Combination machines that offer a jointer and planer in one unit are the talk on the Internet and most woodworking forums these days. We’ve written about the Grizzly and Jet machines in our AWFS coverage, listed the tool as a “Best New Tool of 2007” in our December issue (#166), and we continue to receive questions on a weekly, if not daily, basis. We've test-driven both, so, let’s take a look at the Grizzly G6033 and the Jet JJP-12 and do a little side-by-side comparison.

In my opinion, there are a number of areas to discuss such as the motor, the jointer's fence, the blade guard, the jointer's table and the complexity of the changeover operations (switching between the jointer and the planer).

In comparing the motors of the two machines, one glaring difference stands out – horsepower. A 5-horsepower, 220-volt motor powers the Grizzly tool while the Jet machine boasts a 3-horsepower, 220-volt motor. Each motor produces more than 5,000 rpm making the number of cuts per inch about equal; Grizzly has 15,102 cuts compared to Jets 16,500 cuts.

After the motors, the next most important feature is the fence. The best feature of the fence on the Jet machine is that it does not need to be removed in order to switch between the two operations. However, you do have to slide the fence fully to the rear of the tool in order to lift the jointer bed. The fence is aluminum and over-sized. Being attached in two locations made the fence difficult to adjust (see photo). We experienced racking as we slid the fence across the bed. Knobs and levers hold the fence in position and we felt there could have been more development based around the Jet fence.

The Grizzly fence is strong and easy to adjust. A simple flip of a lever allows you to rotate a knob and move the fence across the jointer bed. The bad news with the Grizzly design is having to remove the entire fence before converting the machine to planer mode. The fence slides off a dovetail way, which is easy enough, but storing the fence each time you use the planer is burdensome. Additionally, because the single tube holding the fence is long and sticks out the back of the machine, it isn’t possible to position the tool tight to a wall in the shop. In essence, the footprint of the tool grows. Overall, however, the Grizzly fence is much better than the Jet in our opinion.

The blades guards for these two machines come from different universes. The Grizzly has the more familiar (at least in the United States) pork-chop style guard. It swings out as the material, and your hand, moves past the cutterhead. The Jet features a design similar to European machines in which the rigid guard raises and lowers, allowing you to adjust to the thickness of your stock. This type guard helps keep your hands from ever passing over the blades. The staff prefers the Jet guard. It's an overall safer design.

When it comes to jointer tables, the Jet machine has a single, heavy table. The top is corrugated. And while that might be easier to keep flat during manufacturing, we felt it added a bit of drag to the workpiece. The jointer table is locked to the base with two catches, one at each end. Release the catches then lift the bed. After that, all you need to do is flip the dust-collection hood and you’re ready to plane your stock. Of course, that’s after you spin the hand wheel to raise the planer bed. (As with all combo machines, you have to lower the planer bed to convert back to the jointer and vice versa.)

The Grizzly has a split, smooth and polished jointer bed and that means an extra step in converting to planer mode. Unlock the catches and lift either the right- or left-side tables, then lift the other half. It doesn’t matter which half is lifted first, you still have to fiddle with the blade guard to finish the positioning of the jointer tables – the guard has to be maneuvered out of the way of the outfeed table.

Next, you’ll need to position the dust collection for the planer. The hood is flipped similar to the Jet but without any latch hook to keep it locked. Also, because this tool has a separate dust-collection port for the jointer, the attachment of the hose to the planer is tricky due to part of the jointer hood being in the way.

Both machines performed excellently in milling and regular operations (we have the G6034 spiral head Grizzly combination machine so a one-to-one comparison is not possible). And prices for the two competitors are relatively close. The Jet JJP-12 can be purchased for around $1,700 while the purchase price for the Grizzly G6033 is at $1,795 (the spiral cutterhead brings the price to $2,295).

Whether these types of machines are the answer to your shop needs is left up to you. I, for one, am quite fond of my dedicated jointer and planer tools. I’m not yet ready to experience changeover when switching operations. There are many times I appreciate leaving the setup on the tools in place. Returning to the jointer to mill another piece of stock is better if you don’t have to spend time carefully matching previous work.

– Glen D. Huey


Read other entries by Glen D. Huey
Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, January 15, 2008 12:50:18 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [12] 
A Proper Bench for Bob

In Christopher Schwarz's new book Workbenches: From Design & Theory to Construction & Use, Chris talks about Thomas Stangeland's working on a makeshift bench. My story is quite similar. Although I've made my living (if you call that living) as a woodworker for more than 30 years, I've never worked on a nice bench on a regular basis. The closest I've come was a maple butcher-block slab on a 2 x 4 base with a quick-release vise. Most of the time, it's been something makeshift and I employ some novel ways of holding work – plane stops stuck down with narrow crown staples, clamps holding clamps holding the work, and I've even been known to sit on things to keep them in place. It's about time I had the bench I've always wanted, and I've been working off and on drawing one for about a year. I'm close to a final design and I'll be building it for an upcoming article in Popular Woodworking.


Here is what I have in mind, a combination of features that appeal to me and fit the way I work. It has some similarities to the benches you've seen in Popular Woodworking and Woodworking Magazine in the last couple years, with a few twists. Like the Roubo bench, the legs are flush with the front of the 3"-thick top. It also has some details lifted from the Nicholson bench. I've moved the apron that is prominent in the Nicholson down and left a gap between it and the top. This will allow me to clamp stuff to the front of the bench, and still reach in to clamp things down to the top.

In the center are four removable, reversible boxes. These will function as tool trays, but when they fill up with junk they can be removed for cleaning, or reversed to fill the area between the two long slabs of the top. I'm hoping this is a viable solution to my love/hate relationship with tool trays. The other advantage of taking them out at times is to provide yet another place to clamp to. I'll also be able to slide drawer boxes over an end of one of the outer sections to work on them before the bottoms go in.

So let me know what you think. Suggestions are welcome – you can leave a comment here or send me an e-mail. I'm still deciding some issues; I haven't yet settled on vises  and I'm thinking of adding a shelf at both the bottom rails and at the bottom of the rails across the front. No cabinets though – that's a separate project I need to get back to. Everyone else in the shop is tired of working around the face frame I made last summer.

--Bob Lang


Read other entries by Robert W. Lang
Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, January 15, 2008 11:43:04 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [19] 
# Friday, January 11, 2008
Woodworking Magazine -- Now Available by Subscription

Woodworking Magazine, a sister publication of Popular Woodworking, is now (finally!) available by subscription.

Here's a little history, in case you're not familiar with Woodworking Magazine. In 2004, it was started by the Popular Woodworking staff – without the blessing of our parent corporation. The market, they thought, was too crowded for another woodworking magazine. But we knew in our gut that this wasn't just another magazine. So, we kept putting it out on the newsstands twice a year as an experiment to see if readers would embrace a magazine with black-and-white photos, techniques that frequently defied conventional wisdom – and no advertising.

Now, thanks to our loyal base of readers, we will publish the magazine four times in 2008, and offer subscriptions by mail. You can find out more about the magazine, and download a free sample issue, at the Woodworking Magazine web site.

You can also see what a bunch of unbiased readers have to say about Woodworking Magazine on the Woodnet forum, listen to a podcast about the magazine from The Wood Whisperer, and read just a sampling of unsolicited praise below.

First, and most important, Woodworking Magazine is the most important contribution to woodworking since the invention of electricity. If I could give an Oscar, or some other widget, for achievements in woodworking publications you all would smack-dab snatch it away in fine style.
-- Bill Wiese, Melbourne, Florida

Your magazine is just what I am looking for to grow the skills that I have. I read every article and learn so much it is scary.
-- Anthony Kennedy

It’s a breath of fresh air to get technical woodworking tips for those woodworkers who still know how to use their hands to craft something.
-- Michael Morin

It's a great publication – too nice to be called a magazine.
-- Peter M. Spirito

To see what makes Woodworking Magazine different, download your free sample issue from the homepage, or simply subscribe now!

-- Megan Fitzpatrick, managing editor



Bookmark and Share
Friday, January 11, 2008 2:58:45 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [1] 
Won't the Shaker Firewood Box Explode?

Reader John Griffin-Wiesner writes: Just got the new Popular Woodworking issue yesterday (February 2008). Another fine issue!

I am confounded by the Shaker wood box. How are the front and back panels supposed to move being nailed to the sides which have the grain running vertically?

Answer: Great question. The answer is: nails.

Lots of earlier furniture appears to be nailed without regard for wood movement, yet it survives to this day intact. In fact, when I visited Pleasant Hill to find a good design for a wood box (I saw about 10 of them), all of them were:

1. Still in good shape without signs of repair or restoration.

2. Nailed together without regard to cross-grain.

Unlike screws, nails will bend a bit as the wood expands and contracts with the seasons. There are limits, of course. And I always prefer to create constructions that accommodate wood movement rather than rely on nails. (By the way, just about any kind of nail will do. I like cut nails, but the wire nails bend easily, too.)

But they work. I've seen it too many times in too many pieces of antique furniture to dismiss it. You can download the entire article on building the Shaker Firewood Box using the link below. You also can read more about my visit to Pleasant Hill on the Woodworking Magazine blog here.

030-31_FEB08PW_ICDT.pdf (280.35 KB)

Christopher Schwarz


Read other entries by Christopher Schwarz
Bookmark and Share
Friday, January 11, 2008 10:45:44 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [6] 
# Thursday, January 10, 2008
And Where Do You Put Your Hand?
One of my favorite woodworking books is Cabinetmaking and Millwork by John L. Feirer. I listed it as one of my three choices for "Must Have Woodworking Bibles" in the Autumn 2006 issue of Woodworking Magazine. It was a high-school shop textbook; my well-worn copy carries a copyright date of 1967, and it is an incredible source of jigs, fixtures and techniques for using woodworking machines. I know I'm not the only one who values this book because many of the jigs described in its pages appear over and over again in other books and in magazines, published after this book.

Nearly all of the jigs and methods in the book are safe, efficient time savers. In my way of thinking, this is what a jig should do. If it takes longer to make the jig than to perform the process another way, what is the point of the jig? One of my gripes about most jig articles is that they give the impression that building the jig will replace the need to develop the skill needed to complete the task at hand. In my experience, you need at least as much skill (often more) to make a workable jig than to go jigless and just make the thing. The jig exists to make a repetitious task less of a chore, and a potentially dangerous task safer. A jig can't make you more capable than you are.

Tapering legs is a case in point, and the illustration on the left, from Cabinetmaking and Millwork, is an excellent example of a jig gone horribly wrong. I googled "table saw tapering jig" and came up with 9,650 images. About half of them were variations on this jig, including several commercially made ones. The other half of the images were a collection of generally complicated ways to work around the problems inherent in this device.

This subject came up the other day at lunch. Chris, Glen and I were out visiting a local reader's shop, and the reader mentioned that he had a method for tapering legs using a jig he made and his surface planer. His motivation? He didn't like the table saw jig shown here. None of us like the jig either, and we each have a quick, reliable method to taper legs. Glen uses the jointer, and there is a video of his technique on the "Videos" page of the web site. Chris (as you might guess) cuts them on the band saw and removes the saw marks with a handplane, and I use a simple sled on the table saw that takes about five minutes to make, is simple to set up and keeps my hands a safe distance away from the saw blade.

So what don't we like about the ubiquitous jig shown above? As commonly illustrated, it is only good for short legs with large tapers. Make one long enough to put a 3/8" taper on a dining-table leg and you'll have an unwieldy mess dancing in the air a couple feet behind the saw. There isn't a good way to hold the work to the jig and the jig against the saw's fence at the same time. And, if you get far enough along to begin the cut, where will your pushing hand be at the end? Apparently, the model for the drawing wasn't quite sure on his first two or three attempts at using this thing.

The four people at lunch the other day were each in possession of 10 fingers, many years of woodworking experience, and enough common sense not to order the fish. There are a couple things we've been doing here at Popular Woodworking to stop the repeated publication of dubious jigs and techniques. Just because something has been in print doesn't mean it's a good idea. We question these things, try them in our shop, and if they don't work we're willing to say "the Emperor isn't wearing any clothes."

Our new column "Jig Journal", which premiered in our August 2007 issue, is dedicated to showing simple, effective jigs. In our November issue, Marc Adams began a seven-part series of articles on "A Better Way to Work." As the owner of the largest woodworking school in the country, Marc is especially concerned about safety, and this series is not a rehash of the same old rules. We're proud to publish this type of article and think that's what makes us a little different. We hope you do, too.

-- Bob Lang

Read other entries by Robert W. Lang
Bookmark and Share
Thursday, January 10, 2008 11:33:54 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [3] 
# Tuesday, January 08, 2008
Tool Review - You Make The Call

Occasionally, Popular Woodworking receives tools that we immediately recognize as good, if not great, ideas and designs. However, they do not seem to fit into a woodshop in the best way. I don’t want to simply pass on writing about these tools because I know they are beneficial to some of our readers and sometimes I think I might not see how the tools can be used in the shop. You know the  saying, something about not seeing the forest because of all the trees.

So, over the next few weeks, I’m offering up a few tools that fall into this category. I would like for you to evaluate these tools and let me know if I’m right (they are great tools, but are not totally useful in the woodshop) or if I clearly missed the boat and these tools would make terrific additions to your woodworking experience.

First up is the Starrett Prosite 5-N-1 Protractor. This protractor is available at Amazon.com for $85 (link to tool). Popular Woodworking reviewed the earlier version of this tool December 2004. In his review, David Thiel wrote that the angle gauge was very easy to use for finding angles and miters. He also wrote that the szie made it a bit bulky to use to fine-tune machine setup in the shop (Click the link to read Thiel’s review Prosite Protractor.pdf (316.64 KB)).

Today, even with the improvements to the markings – they’re laser engraved – and the addition of a couple charts that help find the appropriate settings for cutting crown mouldings and determining roof pitches, my take on this tool is that it’s a wonderful tool for the construction trade. If I were still in that field, I could find many uses for the Prosite Protractor. But in the woodshop, I just cannot find more than an occasional application.

How about it? Am I missing a great use for the Starrett 5-N-1 tool? Or, is it a great tool for applications other than woodworking? Leave a comment for everyone to see or, if you choose, send a message directly to me. If I've missed the call on this tool, I go to the wall to get a review in the magazine.

Next, we’ll take a look at a direct fit air hose system. It’s called APEGRIP and it’s by High Tech Air Connection.

–Glen D. Huey


Read other entries by Glen D. Huey
Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, January 08, 2008 9:40:45 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [4] 
# Friday, January 04, 2008
Tool Test: Craftsman Three-base Router Kit

In our June 2007 issue we reviewed two-base router kits. You can read the full review in Adobe PDF format by clicking here. One of the routers in the test, from Craftsman, was nearly identical to the router from Bosch. As summer ended, we began to get calls and e-mails from readers telling us that the Craftsman router was not to be found. Following up, we learned that Sears had discountinued this model, and would be replacing it with a similar router in a three-base kit, including a D-handle base along with the plunge base and standard base. We've had the new router in our shop for a few weeks, and here are my impressions of it, comparing it to the earlier kit and the other routers we tested.



The price of this kit is around $200, similar to other tools in the group, and the same as the previous kit. The motor had plenty of power, but it was louder and had more vibration than the earlier one. The on/off switch can't be reached without taking a hand off the tool. It also has an electronic soft-start feature that takes several seconds to reach operating speed. The motor housing is flat on top, so it will sit upside down on the bench when changing bits. A spindle lock engages with a pin for one-wrench bit changes. Changing bases was relatively easy, but with the fixed bases, the fine adjustment override has to be pushed in before clamping the motor in place. The override also needs to be pushed to remove the motor. When this is done with the motor unclamped, the motor will drop if you're not holding on to it.

The plunge mechanism has a strong spring, works smoothly and locks by pulling the lever down. The fine depth adjustments are a little sloppy on all three bases, and can be reached from above for adjustments when mounted in a router table. Unclamping the motor to use the fine adjustment changes the height slightly, so zeroing in to a final measurement can be awkward. The base plates hold standard template guides and are made from a clear plastic that is flexible and not quite flat. All in all the router would have rated in the bottom half of the group we tested. There are some nice extra features; vacuum attachments, an LED work light and a decent fence. If having the third base is more important than the quirks, it might be considered a good value.

More information on this tool is available from Craftsman.

— Bob Lang


Read other entries by Robert W. Lang | Read other Tool Tests
Bookmark and Share
Friday, January 04, 2008 10:40:30 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [2] 
# Wednesday, January 02, 2008
Tool Test: Wooden Miter Plane from Philly Planes

Vintage wooden-bodied miter planes are fairly rare birds (at least in the Midwest), so I was quite eager to try a new one made by Philip Edwards in England.

While I'm well-versed in metal-bodied miter planes, I had to educate myself a bit on the history of the wooden ones before putting Edward's plane to use in the Popular Woodworking shop.

John M. Whelan's seminal book "The Wooden Plane" (Astragal Press) says that miter planes appeared in tool catalogs for about 100 years, starting in 1826. There are two major variations: an English tool with the iron bedded with the bevel facing up – like a metal-bodied miter plane. And an American version with the iron bedded with the bevel down.

Edward's miter plane is mostly in the American style. The massive 1/4"-thick cutter is bedded at 38° with the bevel facing down, like a traditional bench plane. The miter plane's iron is secured with a simple wedge and does not have a cap iron, sometimes called a chipbreaker.

This turns out to be a good arrangement. Because the bevel is facing down in this tool, there isn't much of the wooden sole supporting the blade up by the tool's cutting edge. So the thick cutter is a must to prevent blade chatter.

However, the plane does have a bit of English in it. Edwards added a strip of dense end grain directly in front of the mouth of the tool – an English feature, according to Whelan. Because of the way miter planes are used, this is an excellent detail.

Miter planes can be used for a wide variety of chores – not just for trimming the short grain of a miter. The block-like shape of the tool allows it to be used on a shooting board for trimming end grain. Also, the plane serves as an excellent large-scale block plane – it's excellent for trimming the long-grain edges of boards. And the tool's 10"-long sole helps ensure your edges stay straight.

All in all, the plane is quite well-made. The wedge and the wooden body (called the "stock") are goncalo alves, a fairly dense tropical hardwood. The corners of the tool have handsome wide chamfers, like many early wooden-bodied planes. And the plane weighs in at 2 lbs. 12 oz., which gives it the kind of mass I like in a plane designed for a shooting board.  

As far as fit and finish go, it is a quality tool, though not as refined as a plane from Clark & Williams in Eureka Springs, Ark. Nor does the Edward's plane have the same price tag. Edwards charges 85 pounds Sterling for the tool (with the sorry state of the U.S. dollar these days, that's about $170, a good price for a tool of this quality).

My only difficulty with the plane came while I set it up. The wooden stock had moved during its trip across the Atlantic and the sole needed to be trued up. A few minutes on a sheet of sandpaper adhered to some granite and the tool was ready to go. Truing the sole of any of these tools will tend to open up the mouth of the tool, and the mouth on the tester went from infinitesimally small to about 1/64", which is still a very tight mouth.

For now, Edwards is a part-time planemaker. His day job is carpentry – fitting kitchens, hanging doors and the like. Edwards also has been writing articles for British woodworking magazines (Good Woodworking and The Woodworker) and plans to become a full-time planemaker in 2008. His web site – PhillyPlanes.co.uk – already offers a variety of wooden planes and accessories, including a sweet mini panel-raising plane that I reviewed in the February 2008 issue of Popular Woodworking.

Both of these tools are excellent workers, and I recommend them without any reservations. If these tools are any indication, I think Edwards is going to succeed in his new venture.

— Christopher Schwarz


Read other entries by Christopher Schwarz | Read other Tool Tests
Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, January 02, 2008 3:32:27 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [3] 
# Wednesday, December 26, 2007
Festool - Final Entry for the Editors' Event

When I wrapped up the last Festool entry (click to read) I mentioned that I had a tip for using the Domino when building with particleboard. So, I’ll start there then move on to the information about the routers.

We all know that building with particleboard or MDF is difficult. If the weight doesn’t ruin your back, then surely the thought of creating joints in this man-made product has to trouble your thoughts. Of course you can use the Domino for standard methods of joinery, but the idea presented at the Festool Editors’ Event made my eyes open wide.

Many times particleboard is simply screwed together. While that seems like an easy task, it isn’t. Adding screws to particleboard, even special screws designed for particleboard, seldom hold as we would like. And, taking screws out and installing them a number of times, as you would do with “knock-down” furniture designs, increases the likelihood those screw joints will weaken, if not flat-out fail.

So here’s the tip. Determine the screw location (where the screw enters the backing piece of particleboard) then cut a slot for a Domino so the widest profile of the Domino is parallel to the particleboard edge. Stay back from edge about 3/16” and don’t cut all the way through the thickness of the particleboard, don’t want the Domino to show on the outside face.

Next, install a Domino in the slot and allow the glue to dry. Smooth away any extra material of the Domino until the surface is flush. Now as you drive the screw, you’ll be grabbing the Domino instead of just the particleboard. Since the Domino is a hardwood with a grain it holds better than the particleboard ever will.

I’ll bet your particleboard projects stay together longer and stronger with this tactic employed.

On to the Routers
Festool introduced two new routers for release in 2008. The first is a small trim router, the MFK700. What’s new about this router? What makes it a Festool tool? The MFK700 is mountable in both a vertical position, as is standard with most routers, and a horizontal position. Both bases are part of the router kit.

The supplied horizontal base is set with a 1-1/2º degree slope to facilitate trimming laminate and edge banding using a straight bit. I like the idea, but I think a base with no slope would be more beneficial to woodworkers who don’t play in the laminate area. That is in the works according the Festool team.

Each mounting design features Festool-like dust collection. There is quick, single knob changeover between bases and a fine-tune adjustment knob used with the 720 watt motor. Look for a 1/4” and 8mm collet to hold the bits in this 3-pound tool.

In addition, the vertical base has a threaded base plate that’s ready to accept guide bushings with ease. Have you ever had a standard guide bushing come loose in the router? I have and it’s not pretty. The inner ring spins at 20,000 revolutions per minute (RPM) as it’s trapped whirling on the bit, or it ricochets around the shop like a Saturday morning cartoon character. This set-up also eliminates the need to center your bushings or adjust your routing technique each time a bushing is installed.

I’ll be interested in getting a more in-depth look at this router.

The second router shown is Festool’s OF2200, a big 2200 watt, 18 amp workhorse. The variable speed router runs between 10,000 and 22,000 RPM. I’m just going to wet your appetite for this tool with a few features that I found exciting. The first of which is a tool-less base plate and template guide change. It’s a snap. Literally, snap one plate off and snap another plate in and you’re ready for the next router operation. It’s cool.

The OF2200 has double column clamping and there’s also a dust collection shroud used when edge routing that Festool says makes the router 99% dust free. It works. Another feature is the ratcheting spindle lock that makes bit changes faster, easier and smarter. (By the way, that’s the new Festool advertisement slogan – A Faster, Easier and Smarter tool. It’s not just a tool, it’s a Festool.)

This big router has a bit of mass to it at 18.2 pounds and that is the subject of Marc Spagnuolo’s comment I mentioned in the last entry. He suggests using a router of this size and weight for inlay work. Huh? I’ve always used a small router for that type of intricate work. But, if you think about it, Marc’s idea is right on. He says a large router like the Festool OF2200 is perfect because, with a small diameter bit installed, this tool sits rock steady on the work piece as it’s running, no bouncing around. Then all you need to do is guide the router to accomplish the work and not worry about having a death grip on the router to keep it from dancing around the board as you work. Thanks Marc. I’m going to use that tip.

–Glen D. Huey


Read other entries by Glen D. Huey
Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, December 26, 2007 11:24:03 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [0] 
Google Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links